By Citizenship Newspaper
The Federal High Court, sitting in Abuja, Tuesday, for the second time ruled against holding the People’s Democratic Party (PDP) 2025, National Convention.
Justice Peter Lifu also asked the Independent National Electoral Commission(INEC) not to supervise, monitor or recognise the November 15 and 16 convention scheduled to hold in Ibadan, Oyo state.
The order is following a fresh application brought by a former Governor of Jigawa state, Sule Lamido, complaining that he was denied opportunity to buy Chairmanship nomination form to enable him participate in the convention.
The judge predicated the restriction order against PDP on the grounds that the party refused, neglected and failed to comply with relevant conditions and laws for the conduct of such conventions.
The judge held that evidence from Lamido showed that the timetable for the convention was not published for the attention of its members as required by law.
Justice lifu also held that the balance of convenience tilted towards Lamido because he would suffer more if allowed to be unlawfully excluded from the planned convention.
To make remedy, the Judge said that the former governor had undertaken to pay damages to PDP in the event that his suit was found to be frivolous.
According to the Judge, in a Constitutional, due process of law must be strictly followed by those in charge adding that to do otherwise, will endanger democracy itself.
He also said that in line with section 6 of the 1999 Constitution, court of law must not abdicate its role of dispensing justice without fear or favour.
Justice Lifu held that anarchy would be the order of the day anything, anyday and anywhere the court of record abdicate its Constitution assigned functions.
In his final pronouncement, the Judge restrained PDP from proceeding with the convention billed for November 15 and 16 or any other date in Ibadan or any other place.
He also stopped INEC from supervising, monitoring or recognizing the outcome of any convention that be organized by PDP.
It will be recalled that another Judge of the same court, James Omotosho had on October 31 issued similar orders stopping INEC from supervising or recognizing outcome of the convention if conducted.
His ground was predicated on the facts that due process was not followed in the way the convention was being planned.
Besides, Omotosho held that the PDP failed to issue the mandatory 21 days notice of meetings and congresses to enable INEC carry out its mandatory duty of monitoring such meetings and congresses.
Justice Omotosho held that the failure of the PDP to comply with the law has put the planned convention in jeopardy, and subsequently advised the PDP to do the necessary before going ahead with the election.
