A recent investigation by the BBC Global Disinformation Unit has cast serious doubt on claims of a “Christian genocide” in Nigeria, revealing how the International Society for Civil Liberties and Rule of Law (Intersociety) and allied Nigeria’s South East advocacy groups allegedly propagated inflated figures and unverified narratives that have reverberated across international political and religious circles.
The report, titled “Are Christians Being Persecuted in Nigeria as Trump Claims?”, was authored by Olaronke Alo and Chiamaka Enendu of the BBC Global Disinformation Unit, alongside Lagos-based journalist Ijeoma Ndukwe. It scrutinises the origins and credibility of claims that over 125,000 Christians have been killed and 19,000 churches destroyed in Nigeria since 2009—figures widely cited by U.S. conservative media and politicians, including Senator Ted Cruz and Congressman Riley Moore.
When contacted by the BBC, Intersociety failed to provide itemised data or verifiable sources to substantiate its casualty claims. Instead, the organisation accused the BBC of being politically compromised.
The BBC’s findings suggest that Intersociety’s methodology lacks transparency and raises serious concerns about the intent behind its reporting.
Despite the absence of credible evidence, these claims gained traction in U.S. political discourse, culminating in President Donald Trump labelling Nigeria a “country of particular concern” and threatening military action over what he described as a “Christian genocide.”
Intersociety and similar groups have consistently framed violence in Nigeria as targeted jihadist attacks against Christians, often attributing blame to Fulani herders and Islamist militants.
However, independent conflict monitoring organisations such as the Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project (ACLED) report that violence in Nigeria is multifaceted, affecting communities across religious and ethnic lines without clear evidence of a systematic campaign against Christians alone.
The BBC notes that many of these advocacy groups are rooted in southeastern Nigeria, where ethnic and religious identity politics are deeply intertwined. Their narratives often reflect broader grievances about political marginalisation and perceived federal neglect, particularly among the Igbo population.
While Intersociety presents itself as a non-profit, non-government-funded organisation, its advocacy has centred mainly on Igbo Christian interests.
It has also been a vocal supporter of Nnamdi Kanu and the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), framing government actions against the separatist group as religious and ethnic persecution.
The BBC’s investigation underscores the dangers of politicised and unverified data in conflict reporting.
By framing complex intercommunal violence as a one-sided genocide, advocacy groups risk inflaming tensions, distorting international perceptions, and undermining efforts at reconciliation and peacebuilding.
Meanwhile, PRNigeria gathers that Intersociety was founded in July 2008 in Onitsha, southeastern Nigeria, by Emeka Umeagbalasi, a former official with the Civil Liberties Organisation (CLO) and Amnesty International.
Initially focused on electoral reform and governance, the group has increasingly shifted toward reporting on religious and ethnic persecution, often citing casualty figures that diverge sharply from those of independent monitors.
As Nigeria continues to grapple with insecurity across multiple fronts, the report calls for greater scrutiny of data sources and a more nuanced understanding of the country’s conflict dynamics—one that resists oversimplified narratives and prioritises truth over ideology.
A PRNigeria Report
